BibleInteract

In our modern western world, we have been raised with a Greek mindset. Yet, both the Old Testament and the New Testament are deeply Hebraic in their thought and presentation.

There are two different accounts in Genesis that record God’s creation of mankind (Gen 1:27; 2:7). The western approach suggests there were originally two different manuscripts. However, this session promotes a Hebraic understanding that perceives God as the author who included both accounts for a reason.

Our traditional understanding of Esau, as rejected by God, originates, in large part, from a literal interpretation of the New Testament. However, there are two problems: the citation is part of a midrashic argument, and the English word “hate” contradicts the Hebrew meaning.

Interpreting the Bible literally began with Martin Luther 500 years ago, which effectively robbed us of an ability to uncover depth of meaning. Dr. Davis turns to Isaiah 3 to demonstrate the artistic nature of the biblical text.

The Book of Isaiah covers three different historical periods. We must know the historical background to fully appreciate the powerful messages of Isaiah.

If we read the words of Isaiah literally, it sounds like God has dismissed Israel because of sinful behavior. However, the language of wrath and judgment was intended as instruction, not as condemnation.

Isaiah’s parable of the vineyard is steeped in artistic language that leads to a powerful conclusion.

Matthew begins by citing Isaiah’s parable of a vineyard, but then turns in a different direction that leads to a powerful conclusion. We must first understand Isaiah’s parable, and then consider the Matthew’s artistry of language.

Paul declares in Romans 6:15 that “we are not under law.” However, there are two problems with a literal interpretation. Paul is alluding to the Cain and Abel story, and his words must be read in the context of the NT passage. You will discover that the conclusion is quite different from a literal interpretation.